Runs in your browser
Checking your draft does not call an AI model or send the submitted text to a detector API.
Find generic AI phrases, formulaic LinkedIn hooks and repetitive writing structures. The free AI slop checker runs in your browser and explains every match.
Paste a post, email or article. Your text is checked in this browser and is not sent to Zempost or any AI provider.
0 / 5,000 characters
Browser-only check. No signup and no text storage.
The checker looks for 97 exact and structural signals from a 120-pattern reference list. Semantic patterns stay labelled for manual review.
HOW IT WORKS
AI detectors try to guess whether a model wrote something. Zempost asks a narrower, reviewable question: which words and structures make this draft sound generic?
Checking your draft does not call an AI model or send the submitted text to a detector API.
Matched words and structures are highlighted with a rule ID and a plain editing suggestion.
The checker automates 97 exact and structural signals. Subjective patterns remain manual guidance.
AI WORDS AND PHRASES TO AVOID
Writing often sounds like AI when several familiar signals stack together: vague claims, polished filler, dramatic transitions and sentences that all follow the same rhythm. One phrase on its own is rarely a problem.
The useful fix is not to swap one cliché for another. Replace generic claims with a real name, number, example or action. If the draft has no specific detail, keep the sentence plain instead of inventing one.
LINKEDIN AI SLOP CHECKER
OPEN REFERENCE LIST
The complete list is shown for editorial review. “Exact” and “heuristic” rules are checked automatically; “manual” rules need human judgment.
Words that show up far more often in AI output than in human writing. One is a coincidence; three in a paragraph is a pattern.
delve, dive into, deep dive, unpack, explore (for "discuss").
Better: "Here is what the data shows."
tapestry, landscape, realm, sphere, ecosystem, fabric (used abstractly).
Better: "marketing in 2026" or name the actual change.
testament to, beacon of, embodiment of, hallmark of.
Better: "The team shipped it in six weeks."
pivotal, crucial, vital, paramount, critical (as decoration).
Better: "drives 40% of signups."
showcase, highlight, underscore, emphasize, spotlight (as commentary verbs).
Better: "Testing caught three bugs before launch."
foster, cultivate, nurture (applied to abstract things).
Better: Say what the team actually does.
leverage, utilize, harness, capitalize on.
Better: "Use AI to draft the weekly report."
elevate, enhance, empower, supercharge, unlock, amplify.
Better: Name the result: "Post three times a week without writing on weekends."
seamless, robust, cutting-edge, state-of-the-art, best-in-class, world-class.
Better: "it syncs in under a second and hasn't gone down this year."
intricate, multifaceted, nuanced, complex (as filler).
Better: Name two of the factors.
meticulous, meticulously, painstakingly, carefully crafted.
Better: "templates tested on 200 posts."
vibrant, rich, bustling, thriving, dynamic.
Better: "4,000 creators who post weekly."
journey, embark, navigate, voyage, path (for ordinary processes).
Better: "start with your top ten pages."
game changer, revolutionary, groundbreaking, transformative, paradigm shift.
Better: Say what changes and for whom.
Additionally, Furthermore, Moreover, Notably, Importantly (opening sentences).
Better: "It also exports to CSV."
truly, incredibly, deeply, profoundly, remarkably, fundamentally.
Better: Give the number that makes it remarkable.
quietly, silently, subtly (adding drama to plain events).
Better: "Costs rose 12% in March."
align with, resonate with, speak to, in line with.
Better: "posts your audience replies to."
key insight, key takeaway, key factor, key role.
Better: "Post on the same days every week."
in today's fast-paced world, in the digital age, in an era of, now more than ever.
Better: Cut it and start with the point.
Ready-made phrases that fill space without adding meaning.
it's worth noting, it's important to note, it should be noted.
Better: "The API allows 100 calls a minute."
at its core, at the end of the day, when all is said and done, ultimately.
Better: Delete, or say something specific about people.
when it comes to, in terms of, with regard to, in the world of.
Better: "Posts at 9am get more reach than posts at 3pm."
let's dive in, let's get started, buckle up, without further ado.
Better: Start with the first point.
plays a role in, contributes to, is a factor in.
Better: "Posts with 3 to 5 hashtags reached more people in our test."
stands as, serves as, functions as, acts as (instead of "is").
Better: "The dashboard shows every scheduled post."
navigate the complexities of, the ins and outs of, the nuances of.
Better: "explains how Google picks which page to rank."
Whether you're a beginner or a pro, from startups to enterprises.
Better: Say who it is actually for.
look no further, you've come to the right place, this is your ultimate guide.
Better: "Zempost schedules posts across your connected platforms."
unlock the power of, harness the potential of, take it to the next level.
Better: Say the specific gain.
here's the thing, here's the deal, let me be clear, I'll be honest, I'll be straight with you.
Better: "Most people quit in month two."
the truth is, the reality is, the uncomfortable truth, the hard truth.
Better: "SEO takes about six months to show results."
I hope this helps, happy writing, feel free to reach out, let me know if you have any questions.
Better: End on the last useful point.
In conclusion, In summary, To sum up, Overall, All in all.
Better: End on the last concrete point; the reader was just there.
the future is bright, the possibilities are endless, only time will tell, the sky's the limit.
Better: Name one thing that is now possible.
Constructions that AI reaches for again and again.
"It's not X. It's Y." / "This isn't about X, it's about Y."
Better: Say what it does: "It drafts replies for you to approve."
"It's not just fast, it's also accurate."
Better: List what it does.
"The question isn't whether, it's when." / "The problem isn't X. The problem is Y."
Better: "Here is how we use AI for first drafts."
"Not a X. Not a Y. A Z."
Better: "A system: three posts a week, written on Mondays."
A question the writer immediately answers.
Better: "Reach decides how many people see the post."
"The obvious question is...", "You might be wondering..."
Better: Explain how it works.
A short setup, a colon, then a dramatic reveal.
Better: "It's free."
"What nobody tells you", "the part most people miss", "here's what most get wrong".
Better: "Distribution brought us more users than any feature."
this is where it gets interesting, this changes everything, and that's where things get wild.
Better: State the interesting thing.
the useful part, the part where, the best part, the exciting part, the part that stuck with me.
Better: "It connects to your inbox."
Calling something "just" a vivid unrelated thing to make a point.
Better: "Without a plan you post less and repeat topics."
A sentence ends with an -ing clause that tells you what it means.
Better: "Sales rose 20%."
Lists of exactly three adjectives or phrases, by reflex.
Better: Keep the one that is true and provable.
Rotating names for the same thing to avoid repetition.
Better: "The agent drafts, reviews and publishes."
Putting "one" before a noun to sound focused when the number means nothing.
Better: "Start with your weekly newsletter."
boasts, features, offers, maintains (instead of "has").
Better: "The app has a drag-and-drop calendar."
imagine a world where, picture this, what if I told you.
Better: Describe what the product does today.
may potentially, could possibly, might help to, can sometimes.
Better: "This improved reply rate by 8% in our test." Or cut it.
"While X has benefits, it also has drawbacks."
Better: Take a position and support it.
"From startups to enterprises", "from strategy to execution".
Better: Name the two steps you actually handle.
Telling the reader how to read the text.
Better: Show why it matters, or delete the aside.
"Actually, let me rephrase that", "Or rather..."
Better: "It's instant."
Slop is often in the shape of the text, not the words.
Many short lines in a row, each a slogan.
Better: Write it as one paragraph.
Strings of fragments for rhythm.
Better: One full sentence that says what you do every day.
Several lines that start with the same word or phrase.
Better: "It saves about four hours a week."
Every sentence the same length and structure.
Better: Vary length when it helps the point.
Long inventories of nouns in one breath.
Better: Pick the two that matter here.
Bullet points where two sentences of prose would read better.
Better: One sentence.
Headers over one or two sentences.
Better: Fold it into the paragraph above.
A final paragraph that repeats the whole piece.
Better: End on the last point or the next action.
A final "deep" one-liner.
Better: End on the clearest concrete sentence.
A formulaic "Despite challenges, the future looks promising" closer.
Better: Name the challenge and what is being done.
"And honestly...", "And look...", "So yeah..." used as filler.
Better: Say what clicked.
A short reply split into sections with headers and bold labels.
Better: Three sentences.
AI likes making things vivid when they should be clear.
Abstract things doing human or physical actions.
Better: "Your data shows Tuesday posts get more replies."
Data, products or agents that live or sit somewhere.
Better: "where your customer data is stored."
Systems that "get honest", "tell the truth", "hide" or "reveal".
Better: "Analytics now count only real views."
Two or three images in one sentence.
Better: Drop both images and say what drives growth.
fuel, engine, rocket, catalyst, springboard, flywheel (as decoration).
Better: "posts that bring in signups."
secret sauce, magic, silver bullet, holy grail.
Better: "Accounts that posted weekly grew twice as fast."
The deepest kind of slop: text that sounds informative and says nothing.
Inflating significance: "marks a pivotal moment", "a significant shift".
Better: State the fact and let the reader judge.
experts agree, studies show, many believe, it is widely regarded.
Better: Name the study, or cut the claim.
Claims any company could make.
Better: "Our AI drafts a week of posts from a 3-line brief."
A sentence that could move unchanged to another company or topic.
Better: A sentence only you could write.
Lines that sound deep and mean nothing concrete.
Better: Say what you measure and why.
Replacing a sharp fact with a generic description.
Better: "who wrote the Kubernetes scheduler."
Invented numbers, names or examples presented as real.
Better: A real example, or none.
Labeling something surprising, important or interesting.
Better: "The simple version got twice the clicks."
"featured in top outlets", "widely recognized", "has an active social media presence".
Better: Name one, with a link.
Every point gets a "however" so the text never commits.
Better: Say which limitation matters for this reader.
Telling the reader to "optimize", "be strategic" or "stay consistent" without saying how.
Better: "Post Tuesday to Thursday between 8 and 10am."
"Everything you need to know", "the ultimate guide", "master X in minutes".
Better: "How to write a LinkedIn post that gets replies."
Em dashes used everywhere for rhythm.
Better: "It's fast and free." Use commas, periods or parentheses.
Random words in bold for emphasis.
Better: No bold; let the sentence carry it.
✅ 🚀 💡 👉 used as list markers or decoration.
Better: A plain sentence.
Every Word Capitalized In Headings.
Better: "How to grow your audience on LinkedIn"
Every line starts with a bold label and a colon.
Better: A sentence about the one that matters.
Asterisks, hashtags or headers pasted into emails, posts or forms.
Better: Plain text.
Curly quotes, special dashes and non-breaking spaces mixed with plain text.
Better: Pick one style.
Exclamation marks on ordinary sentences.
Better: "We updated the settings page."
𝗕𝗼𝗹𝗱 or 𝓈𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓅𝓉 letters across whole lines.
Better: Plain text, one bold phrase at most (screen readers can't read these).
A table where a sentence would do.
Better: "A is cheaper; B is faster."
Text that was clearly copied out of a chat window.
Certainly!, Absolutely!, Great question!, Of course!
Better: Delete it.
You're absolutely right, what a great idea, I love this.
Better: Answer the point.
Would you like me to..., Let me know if you'd like a shorter version.
Better: Delete it.
Lead-ins like "Here is a polished version of your post:" left in the final text.
Better: Delete the line.
[Your Name], [Company], [insert statistic], XX%.
Better: Fill it in or cut the sentence.
As an AI, I don't have personal opinions; my knowledge is limited to...
Better: Delete it.
"Based on available information", "specific details are limited".
Better: Find the figure or don't mention it.
Leftover markers like [1], contentReference, oaicite, turn0search0.
Better: Remove them, and check the claim they were attached to.
Patterns that turn a post into "LinkedIn slop".
One sentence per line, top to bottom.
Better: Short paragraphs.
"I was fired. Best thing that ever happened.", "Unpopular opinion:", "Stop doing X."
Better: Open with the specific thing that happened or the specific claim.
I'm thrilled/excited/humbled to announce, I'm proud to share.
Better: "I joined Acme to lead the growth team."
Read that again., Let that sink in., I'll say it louder.
Better: Delete it. If the line needs a second read, rewrite it.
Engagement-bait closers.
Better: Ask a real question, or don't.
"Here are 7 lessons I learned from..." with generic lessons.
Better: One lesson with the story behind it.
"I don't usually post this, but...", "This might be controversial, but..."
Better: Post it without the preamble.
🧵, 1/, "A thread" on content that isn't a thread.
Better: Write the post.
Ten or more hashtags at the end.
Better: Three relevant ones, or none.
Self-aware closers that announce the ending.
Better: Just stop.
"P.S. Repost ♻️ if this helped." on every post.
Better: Drop it, or use it rarely.
Announcing quality instead of delivering it: no fluff, just value; straight to the point; real talk.
Better: Delete the announcement.
Generic replies: "Great insights!", "So true!", "Thanks for sharing, this is gold."
Better: Reply to something specific in the post, or don't reply.
"I failed. I was broke. Then I discovered X." built to sell.
Better: Tell what happened, with dates and numbers.
"Everyone says X. They're wrong."
Better: Make your claim and back it up; skip the strawman.
Pattern reference adapted from an open-source, MIT-licensed reference list. Zempost’s browser-based detection implementation is independent.
FAQ
An AI slop detector checks for words, phrases and writing structures that can make text feel generic or formulaic. It should not claim to prove who wrote the text.
No. It checks writing patterns, not authorship. People can use these patterns, and AI-written text can avoid them.
No. The check runs locally in your browser. The submitted text is not sent to Zempost or any AI provider and is not stored by this tool.
Repeated stock phrases, vague claims, identical sentence shapes and formulaic LinkedIn hooks can make writing sound produced rather than specific. The checker points to concrete patterns you can review.
Yes. The reference list includes LinkedIn patterns such as broetry, engagement-bait closers, hashtag walls and announcement formulas.
Compose, schedule and publish to every network from one workspace. Join 12,000+ teams your first 14 days are on us.
zempost

Published
to 6 networks